当前位置:

2009年6月ACCA:F4真题评分标准二

发表时间:2011/3/22 12:57:59 来源:互联网 点击关注微信:关注中大网校微信
关注公众号

为了帮助考生系统的复习ACCA考试课程全面的了解2011年ACCA考试的相关重点,小编特汇总了ACCA历年考题,希望对您参加本次考试有所帮助!!

6 This question requires candidates to explain the operation of the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986.

8-10 marks Thorough to complete answers, showing a detailed understanding of the legislation.

5-7 marks A clear understanding of the topic, but perhaps lacking in detail.

2-4 marks Some knowledge, although perhaps not clearly expressed, or very limited in its knowledge and understanding of the topic.

0-1 mark Little or no knowledge of the topic.

7 This question is divided into two parts and requires candidates to explain some essential terms in relation to the United Nations Convention on International Bills Of Exchange and International Promissory Notes:

(a) Requires a definition of what is actually meant by an international bill of exchange.

3-4 marks A thorough explanation of the topic with references to the Convention provisions.

0-2 marks Some but little or no understanding of the topic.

(b) Requires an explanation of the roles of some specific parties.

5-6 marks A thorough explanation of the meaning and operation of endorsement

2-4 marks Some general understanding, but perhaps lacking in specific information.

0-1 mark Little if any understanding.

8 This question requires candidates to explain the circumstances under which a party can avoid a contract under the UN Convention on the International Sale of Goods on the grounds of anticipatory breach of contract. It requires candidates to analyse a problem scenario and explain and apply the law appropriately.

8-10 marks Good to complete answer which shows thorough knowledge of the appropriate provisions of the convention and applies them accurately.

5-7 marks Fair explanation of the convention as it applies to anticipatory breach of contract, but perhaps lacking in detail, or only dealing well with one aspect.

0-4 marks Some basic knowledge of what is involved in anticipatory breach under the Convention, but no real depth of understanding. Perhaps an unbalanced answer that only deals with one part of the question.

9 This question requires a consideration of the statutory duties placed on company directors under the Companies Act 2006.

8-10 marks Thorough to complete answers, showing a detailed understanding of the rules relating to conflict of interest.

5-7 marks A clear understanding of the topic but perhaps lacking in detail or application.

2-4 marks Some knowledge, although perhaps not clearly expressed, or very limited in its application.

0-1 mark Little or no knowledge of the topic.

10 This question requires candidates to explain the meaning and regulation of the two criminal offences of insider dealing and money laundering and apply that law to a problem scenario.

8-10 marks Clear analysis of the problem scenario - recognition of both the criminal law issues raised and a convincing application of the legal principles to the facts.

6-7 marks Sound analysis of the problem - recognition of the major principles involved and a fair attempt at applying them. Perhaps sound in knowledge but lacking in analysis and application.

3-5 marks Unbalanced answer perhaps showing some appropriate knowledge but weak in analysis or application.

0-2 marks Very weak answer showing little analysis, appropriate knowledge or application.

编辑推荐:

了解更多关于2011年ACCA/CAT的考试

2011年ACCA/CAT最新考试动态

2011年ACCA/CAT 在线模拟考试 

2011年ACCA/CAT考试 报考指南

(责任编辑:)

2页,当前第1页  第一页  前一页  下一页
最近更新 考试动态 更多>