为了帮助广大考生系统的复习2011翻译资格考试，更好的掌握翻译资格考试的重点内容，小编特编辑汇总了2011年翻译资格考试的重点辅导资料，希望对您此次参加考试有所帮助！

During our discussions on this question, Melinda and I read an article about the

millions of children who were dying every year in poor countries From diseases

that we had long ago made harmless in this country. Measles, malaria, pneumonia,

hepatitis B, yellow fever. One disease I had never even heard of, rotavirus, was

killing half a million kids each year ? none of them in the United States.

在讨论过程中，Melinda和我读到了一篇文章，里面说在那些贫穷的国家，每年有数百万的儿童死于那些在美国早已不成问题的疾病。麻疹、疟疾、肺炎、乙型肝炎、黄热病、还有一种以前我从未听说过的轮状病毒，这些疾病每年导致50万儿童死亡，但是在美国一例死亡病例也没有。

We were shocked. We had just assumed that if millions of children were dying and

they could be saved, the world would make it a priority to discover and deliver

the medicines to save them. But it did not. For under a dollar, there were

interventions that could save lives that just weren't being delivered.

我们被震惊了。我们想，如果几百万儿童正在死亡线上挣扎，而且他们是可以被挽救的，那么世界理应将用药物拯救他们作为头等大事。但是事实并非如此。那些价格还不到一美元的救命的药剂，并没有送到他们的手中。

If you believe that every life has equal value, it's revolting to learn that

some lives are seen as worth saving and others are not. We said to ourselves:

"This can't be true. But if it is true, it deserves to be the priority of our

giving."

如果你相信每个生命都是平等的，那么当你发现某些生命被挽救了，而另一些生命被放弃了，你会感到无法接受。我们对自己说：“事情不可能如此。如果这是真的，那么它理应是我们努力的头等大事。”

So we began our work in the same way anyone here would begin it. We asked: "How

could the world let these children die?"

所以，我们用任何人都会想到的方式开始工作。我们问：“这个世界怎么可以眼睁睁看着这些孩子死去?”

The answer is simple, and harsh. The market did not reward saving the lives of

these children, and governments did not subsidize it. So the children died

because their mothers and their fathers had no power in the market and no voice

in the system.

答案很简单，也很令人难堪。在市场经济中，拯救儿童是一项没有利润的工作，政府也不会提供补助。这些儿童之所以会死亡，是因为他们的父母在经济上没有实力，在政治上没有能力发出声音。

But you and I have both.

但是，你们和我在经济上有实力，在政治上能够发出声音。

We can make market forces work better for the poor if we can develop a more

creative capitalism ? if we can stretch the reach of market forces so that more

people can make a profit, or at least make a living, serving people who are

suffering From the worst inequities. We also can press governments around the

world to spend taxpayer money in ways that better reflect the values of the

people who pay the taxes.

我们可以让市场更好地为穷人服务，如果我们能够设计出一种更有创新性的资本主义制度——如果我们可以改变市场，让更多的人可以获得利润，或者至少可以维持生活——那么，这就可以帮到那些正在极端不平等的状况中受苦的人们。我们还可以向全世界的政府施压，要求他们将纳税人的钱，花到更符合纳税人价值观的地方。

If we can find approaches that meet the needs of the poor in ways that generate

profits for business and votes for politicians, we will have found a sustainable

way to reduce inequity in the world. This task is open-ended. It can never be

finished. But a conscious effort to answer this challenge will change the world.

如果我们能够找到这样一种方法，既可以帮到穷人，又可以为商人带来利润，为政治家带来选票，那么我们就找到了一种减少世界性不平等的可持续的发展道路。这个任务是无限的。它不可能被完全完成，但是任何自觉地解决这个问题的尝试，都将会改变这个世界。

相关文章：

2011翻译资格考试翻译练习：比尔盖茨的毕业演讲双语汇总

更多2011翻译资格考试辅导资料点击查看

编辑推荐：

权威专家制作2011年翻译资格考试远程辅导方案，助你轻松过关！

点此关注2011翻译资格考试时间动态，欢迎定制免费短信提醒业务！

与翻译资格考试考友们在线交流，就来加入翻译资格考试论坛吧！

（责任编辑：中大编辑）